How To Avoid Bias in Qualitative Research

The purpose of qualitative research is to understand a problem, occurrence, or phenomena by collecting and reviewing subjective information and participant observations.To accurately and correctly interpret the information, researchers must strive to study the data with limited bias or outside influence.It can be difficult to recognize and correct bias because the data is subjective and specific to a person.Accurate and impartial data, hypotheses, and conclusions can be produced if you know how to recognize and limit participant and researcher bias.

Step 1: Guidelines for conducting research should be reviewed.

If your research is being funded by a university, business, or another sponsor, be sure to understand the terms and conditions of the research agreement.The results may have to be shared with the institution.Researchers are required to reveal any conflicts of interest in many agreements.Review your agreement with your sponsor to make sure that you are following the guidelines.

Step 2: It's a good idea to draft your study early in the process.

You should write a draft of your study before you start collecting data.When you enter that phase of research, you will focus on collecting the data.It can help you to recognize bias later in the process by creating an early record of your expectations.

Step 3: Keep records that are detailed.

Detailed notes and recordings should be kept by every researcher.Don't forget to record the data during the experiment or observation.Errors can be introduced into your data if you wait to record it.

Step 4: All data should be included in the report.

Even if the data didn't seem useful, you should include it in your report.You should acknowledge whether you had any expectations or not.The reader should be able to see all the data so they can make their own conclusions.Providing all the data to your reader will help prevent you from misrepresenting the information and from introducing bias into the study.

Step 5: Accept the limitations.

The section that describes your study limitations should be included in your report or paper.If there are any questions that need further research, be candid about them in this section.Your reader will be shown that you have thought about your research critically and honestly.If you have conducted an opinion poll, for example, and you realized that some of your questions may have prompted a person to answer in a certain way, acknowledge that in this section.A statement that our research was being sponsored by the school was included in the survey questions.The two remaining questions were only influenced by this statement.

Step 6: Asking indirect questions will limit bias.

It is important to acknowledge that the participant's own answers may be incorrect if your research methods include interviewing participants.People tend to structure responses that make them seem more likable, and they may be less inclined to give a honest answer on controversial topics.Asking indirect questions and asking them to think about what a third party would do in a particular situation is how to combat this.If you are interviewing a coworker, don't ask if they are happy in their job.The question should be rephrased so that it isn't as direct.This indirect question about a third party can foster a honest response from the participant.

Step 7: Ask open-ended questions.

Asking participants open-ended questions will allow you to better understand your research topic.These types of questions allow additional information to flow freely, which may reveal emotional responses and attitudes toward the topic that you may not have considered before.These types of questions can help you collect more meaningful data.Don't ask a participant a close-ended question.Ask them how they felt about each candidate instead of asking who they voted for.Ask employees how the process has influenced their work if you want to gauge if a new process is helpful.The question "How has this process helped or hindered your workflow?" will reveal more than simply asking whether or not they like the new process.

Step 8: Keep a neutral stance.

A neutral and impartial stance is maintained on everything from the subject matter to the sponsor of the study.It is possible for a participant to tailor their answers to fit your expectations.A participant may be influenced by the sponsor's reputation, mission statement, or overall impact in an industry, if a particular company is sponsoring the study.Try to remove any trace of the sponsor from the interview or observation.The materials provided to the participants should not include your company's logo or school seal.If a person is being asked about the efficiency of a school, they may give a biased answer if they suspect that the school is doing research.If you are collecting opinions about the admissions process from current students, you should not tell the participants that you work in the office or sit on the committee.

Step 9: It's a bad idea to imply that there is a right answer.

Acquiescence bias is a tendency to be positive and agreeable.It takes less effort to agree and move on than to give a thorough, honest feedback.To prompt meaningful responses, avoid questions that ask someone to agree or disagree, and remove any false questions from an interview or a survey.Ask item-specific questions instead of asking respondents to agree or disagree in a customer satisfaction survey.A more direct question would be, "My experience in the store was satisfactory."Ask a participant, "How was your shopping experience at this store?"It's a good idea to allow the respondents to review their answers before they submit their response, as this will allow them to confirm their responses accurately.

Step 10: You should be aware of confirmation bias.

Confirmation bias occurs when a researcher interprets data in a way that supports their hypothesis.It's important to be aware of this form of bias to make sure it doesn't affect your research.Confirmation bias can affect a lot of academic research and everyday situations.During an election, supporters of a particular candidate can only look for news sources that show them in a positive light.Confirmation bias is what this is.This can affect how you view a candidate.

Step 11: Consider every reply.

Some of the data that you collect may not be helpful at the time.All data should be evaluated equally throughout the collection process.Your interpretations and conclusions will be skewed if you collect data that is perceived as meaningful.You may miss out on meaningful patterns that could inform your conclusion.

Step 12: Sort the data by Collate.

You should organize and record your data after you have collected it.Record numerical data or survey questions onto a spreadsheet, enter data into an online database or program, or convert interviews into a word processing system.It's easier to sort and study if you organize the information into different categories.There are categories that make sense for your project.It can be listed by observation type, date, location, or participant background information.Ask someone to help or review your work as you sort or code your data.It is likely that you will need to interpret ambiguous answers.The risk of bias is reduced by having multiple researchers interpreting the data.

Step 13: An outsider will review your work during the study.

A fellow researcher, mentor, or colleague who is not familiar with the study can read through your report objectively and find signs of bias that you may not have noticed.bias can be present in all levels of research, and study authors may not be able to recognize it.Ask a colleague to review your methods section to look for questions or approaches that may lead to biased data.When writing your final report, ask a mentor or researcher to look at the results and conclusions to see if there are any signs of bias.

Related Posts:

  1. What are some real life examples of bias?
  2. What is implicit bias in workplace?
  3. How To Reduce Selection Bias
  4. Conduct a workshop.