The Fugitive Slave Clause is part of the Constitution. What does the clause say?

The outcome of discussions and negotiations between Northern and Southern delegates was the Fugitive Slave Clause of the Constitution.When considering its adoption, there are seven important dates.Each day, a decision was recorded in the documents.The dates are listed in chronological order.The Fugitive Slave Clause was first mentioned in the last article of the Northwest Ordinance.It was passed on July 14, 1787.At the time the delegates were passing the Connecticut Compromise on federal representation and Congressional powers, the news of the Northwest Ordinance was reaching the Constitutional Convention.The Committee of Detail issued a report.The Extradition Clause was addressed in article XV, but there was no mention of the fugitive slave clause.The South Carolina delegation tried to include fugitive slaves in the "fugitive" provision of the clause.The delegation came up with a separate fugitive clause that was accepted and placed right under the original extradition clause in the Committee of Style Report.The delegates agreed to change the language of the Fugitive Slave Clause after appointing a Committee of Style.The Constitution was signed by 39 delegates at the Convention.

The Fugitive Slave Clause is located in the Constitution and invites the reader to compare and contrast it with the Extradition Clause.

There will be no slavery or forced labor in the territory, unless the party has been convicted of a crime.

Any person charged with treason, felony or high misdemeanor in any State who flees from justice and is found in another State, will be delivered up and removed to the State having jurisdiction of the offence.

In order to comprehend all proper cases, the words, "high misdemeanor" and "other crime" were struck out and replaced with a more technical meaning.

They wantedfugitive slaves and servants to be delivered like criminals.

Mr. Sherman saw no reason for the public to surrender a slave or servant to a horse.

Mr. BUTLER withdrew his proposition in order to make a specific provision.

If a person bound to service or labor in any of the United States escapes into another State, he or she will not be discharged from such labor or service.There was a con.

A person charged with treason, felony, or other crime who flees from justice and is found in another State, should be delivered up and removed to the State having jurisdiction of the crime.

No person legally held to service or labor in one State, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of regulations subsisting therein, be discharged from such labor or service.

There is an article 4, Sect.The term "legally" was removed and the words "under the laws" were added, in compliance with the wishes of some who thought the term was equivocal.

If a person charged with treason, felony, or other crime flees from justice and is found in another state, the executive authority of the state where he fled will have to remove him from the jurisdiction of that state.

No person held to Service or Labor in one State will be discharged from such service or labor if they escape into another State.