There are pros and cons to hydrostatic weighing and body fat testing.
The motivating factor in the extensive research on the measurement of body composition has been the increase in physical awareness among people.hydrostatic weighing has gained a lot of attention.Buzzle presents the pros and cons of weighing.
The motivating factor in the extensive research on the measurement of body composition has been the increase in physical awareness among people.hydrostatic weighing has gained a lot of attention.Buzzle presents the pros and cons of weighing.
Patients with osteoporosis have lower bone densities.Athletes have denser bones than the rest.There is a chance of overestimation and underestimation of body fat in these cases.
The most accurate test to measure a subject's body composition is hydrodensitometry.The other terms used for this test are water weighing and static body composition analysis.It helps determine the density of the body.
Do you want to write for us?Good writers who want to spread the word are what we're looking for.We'll talk if you get in touch with us.
The weight of the fluid displaced by that object is equal to the counteractive force acting upon it.
The body density is estimated by the substitution of these values in the formula.The relation gives the body density.
Nowadays, hydro-densitometry is used to determine the body fat composition in subjects or patients.The body is made up of two componentslean mass and body fat.A high body fat content makes a body stronger.Lean mass of the body is denser than water and makes the subject sink.People with higher fat in their body have a greater weight difference underwater.Information about the body density is provided by static weighing.
Do you want to write for us?Good writers who want to spread the word are what we're looking for.We'll talk if you get in touch with us.
Let's take a look at the pros and cons of the method of estimating the body composition of a subject.
The net body volume is not required in the calculation method.
The least accurate testing methods have an error limit of less than 1.5%.
It proves to be an alternative to the other electrical impedance-based test devices.
The testing setup takes up a lot of floor space.There needs to be a more spacious clinical arrangement.
The equipment is not readily available to a lot of people.Universities and medical services have easy access to these equipment.
It takes specially trained professionals to operate the setup and carry out the testing procedure.
The test requires the subject to exhale all the air and sit down.The air bubbles around the subject need to be eliminated as much as possible.Most patients don't like this situation.
Different levels of hydration in the subject may affect the results of the test.
The minimum residual air in the lungs left after complete exhalation is a possibility of considerable error.To get more accurate results, the value of RV needs to be assumed to the nearest possible value.
The research on the accuracy of the test was done on Caucasian adults.A different percentage of error might be produced by the results for other ethnicities.
Testing methods for body composition are being introduced on a daily basis.The method of testing is the most acclaimed so far due to its higher relative accuracy.